Malcolm Muhammad v. Lieutenant Fleming
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:15-cv-00008-JLK-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999713145]. Mailed to: Malcolm Muhammad. [15-6989, 15-6991]
Appeal: 15-6989
Doc: 21
Filed: 12/07/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6989
MALCOLM MUHAMMAD,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT FLEMING; Y. TAYLOR; HENRY PONTON; C/O COMPTON;
C/O JUSTICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 15-6991
MALCOLM MUHAMMAD,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
Y. TAYLOR; R. WICKER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:15-cv-00008-JLK-RSB, 7:15-cv-00057-JLK-RSB)
Submitted:
November 18, 2015
Decided:
Before KING, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
December 7, 2015
Appeal: 15-6989
Doc: 21
Filed: 12/07/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcolm Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl O’Shea,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia;
Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond,
Virginia, for, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-6989
Doc: 21
Filed: 12/07/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Malcolm
Muhammad
appeals
the
district
court’s
orders
dismissing these actions without prejudice for failure to pay
the
filing
fee.
reversible error.
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Muhammad v. Fleming, No. 7:15-cv-00008-
JLK-RSB; Muhammad v. Taylor, No. 7:15-cv-00057-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va.
May 21, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?