Malcolm Muhammad v. Lieutenant Fleming

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:15-cv-00008-JLK-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999713145]. Mailed to: Malcolm Muhammad. [15-6989, 15-6991]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-6989 Doc: 21 Filed: 12/07/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6989 MALCOLM MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LIEUTENANT FLEMING; Y. TAYLOR; HENRY PONTON; C/O COMPTON; C/O JUSTICE, Defendants - Appellees. No. 15-6991 MALCOLM MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. Y. TAYLOR; R. WICKER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:15-cv-00008-JLK-RSB, 7:15-cv-00057-JLK-RSB) Submitted: November 18, 2015 Decided: Before KING, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. December 7, 2015 Appeal: 15-6989 Doc: 21 Filed: 12/07/2015 Pg: 2 of 3 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Malcolm Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl O’Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-6989 Doc: 21 Filed: 12/07/2015 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s orders dismissing these actions without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muhammad v. Fleming, No. 7:15-cv-00008- JLK-RSB; Muhammad v. Taylor, No. 7:15-cv-00057-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. May 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?