Christopher Oxendine-Bey v. John Hinson
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-ct-03001-F. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Christopher Oxendine-Bey. [15-6996]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
CHRISTOPHER M. OXENDINE-BEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
JOHN HINSON; JOHN BODY; JOHN GRAY; JANE WILLIAMS;
DANIELS; JOHN HAIRING; JOHN STOCK; JOHN MOYER;
SINGLETON; JANE HART; JOHN LENNON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:15-ct-03001-F)
November 17, 2015
November 19, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher M. Oxendine-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district
Oxendine-Bey v. Hinson, No. 5:15-ct-03001-F (E.D.N.C.
May 11 & June 16, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
Insofar as Oxendine-Bey’s complaint could be construed as
raising a “failure to protect” claim unrelated to his excessive
force claim, we conclude this claim also would be subject to
See Danser v. Stansbury, 772 F.3d 340, 346-47 (4th
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?