Charles Thomas v. South Carolina DOC

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:14-cv-04903-DCN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999659126]. Mailed to: Charles Thomas. [15-7001]

Appeal: 15-7001

Doc: 8

Filed: 09/14/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7001

CHARLES EDWARD THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; JON OZMINT, Former
Prison Director; MEDICAL DIVISION; FINANCIAL DIVISION,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
BUDGET CONTROL; SOUTH CAROLINA LOCAL GOVERNMENT, In their
individual and official capacities,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(0:14-cv-04903-DCN)

Submitted:

September 9, 2015

Decided:

September 14, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Edward Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7001

Doc: 8

Filed: 09/14/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Charles Edward Thomas appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss, after
a

28

U.S.C.

pursuant

§ 1915

to

42

Disabilities

(2012)

U.S.C.

Act,

42

review,

Thomas’

§ 1983

(2012);

the

U.S.C.

§§ 12101-12300

claims

brought

Americans

with

(2012);

the

Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701-796l (2012); and the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 1320d

to

1320d-9

(2012),

and

declining

to

exercise

supplemental jurisdiction over Thomas’ state law claims.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

Thomas v.

S.C.

June

Dep’t

2015).
legal
before

of

Corr.,

No.

0:14-cv-04903-DCN

(D.S.C.

18,

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2