US v. Christopher Oden
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [999662282-2] Originating case number: 3:11-cr-00056-GMG-RWT-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999681729]. Mailed to: Christopher William Oden FCI PETERSBURG MEDIUM FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 1000 Petersburg, VA 23804. [15-7006]
Appeal: 15-7006
Doc: 8
Filed: 10/20/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7006
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM ODEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief
District Judge. (3:11-cr-00056-GMG-RWT-1)
Submitted:
October 15, 2015
Decided:
October 20, 2015
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher William Oden, Appellant Pro Se. Shawn Angus Morgan,
Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia;
Erin
K.
Reisenweber,
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Martinsburg, West Virginia; Stephen Donald Warner, Assistant
United States Attorney, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7006
Doc: 8
Filed: 10/20/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
William
appeals
PER CURIAM:
Christopher
orders
denying
his
Oden
motions
have
for
a
the
sentence
the
reduction
record
and
court’s
and
for
find
no
reconsideration.
We
reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
reviewed
district
United States v. Oden, No. 3:11-cr-
00056-GMG-RWT-1 (N.D.W. Va., Mar. 30, 2015; May 26, 2015).
deny
Oden’s
motion
for
resentencing.
We
dispense
with
We
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?