US v. Christopher Oden

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [999662282-2] Originating case number: 3:11-cr-00056-GMG-RWT-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999681729]. Mailed to: Christopher William Oden FCI PETERSBURG MEDIUM FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 1000 Petersburg, VA 23804. [15-7006]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7006 Doc: 8 Filed: 10/20/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7006 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM ODEN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:11-cr-00056-GMG-RWT-1) Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 20, 2015 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher William Oden, Appellant Pro Se. Shawn Angus Morgan, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia; Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia; Stephen Donald Warner, Assistant United States Attorney, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7006 Doc: 8 Filed: 10/20/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 William appeals PER CURIAM: Christopher orders denying his Oden motions have for a the sentence the reduction record and court’s and for find no reconsideration. We reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. reviewed district United States v. Oden, No. 3:11-cr- 00056-GMG-RWT-1 (N.D.W. Va., Mar. 30, 2015; May 26, 2015). deny Oden’s motion for resentencing. We dispense with We oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?