US v. Donald Caston

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:06-cr-00190-REP-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999684623]. Mailed to: Donald Caston. [15-7012]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7012 Doc: 7 Filed: 10/23/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7012 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DONALD CASTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cr-00190-REP-1) Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald M. Caston, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Calvin Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7012 Doc: 7 Filed: 10/23/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Donald Caston appeals the district court’s orders denying Caston a sentence reduction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), and denying as unauthorized reconsideration of that order. find no reversible error. Caston’s motion for We have reviewed the record and Further, the district court properly recognized that it lacked the authority to entertain a motion for reconsideration in a § 3582(c)(2) proceeding. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235–36 (4th Cir. 2010). therefore affirm district court. the orders for the reasons argument adequately by the See United States v. Caston, No. 3:06–cr–00190- REP-1 (E.D Va. May 7, 2015 & June 9, 2015). oral stated We because presented in the the facts and materials legal before We dispense with contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?