Charles Hoye v. Harold Clarke

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:14-cv-00124-MFU. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999734938]. Mailed to: Charles Hoye. [15-7016]

Appeal: 15-7016

Doc: 15

Filed: 01/13/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7016

CHARLES T. HOYE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections;
GARY L. BASS, Reg. Administrator, Virginia Department of
Corrections, Central Regional Office; SAMUEL V. PRUETT,
Warden, Coffeewood Correctional Center; I. T. GILMORE,
Assistant Warden, Coffeewood Correctional Center; R. W.
MARTIN, EBP/Reentry Manager, Coffeewood Correctional Center;
D. GOURDINE, Inst. Pgms. Mgr. (IPM), Coffeewood Correctional
Center; L. D. MOORE, Food Service Admin., Coffeewood
Correctional Center,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District
Judge. (7:14-cv-00124-MFU)

Submitted:

December 29, 2015

Before WILKINSON and
Senior Circuit Judge.

KEENAN,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

January 13, 2016

and

HAMILTON,

Appeal: 15-7016

Doc: 15

Charles T. Hoye,
Senior Assistant
Appellees.

Filed: 01/13/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

Appellant Pro Se.
Attorney General,

Richard Carson Vorhis,
Richmond, Virginia, for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-7016

Doc: 15

Filed: 01/13/2016

Pg: 3 of 3

Hoye

the

PER CURIAM:
Charles

T.

appeals

district

court’s

order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief

on

his

42

U.S.C.

§

1983

(2012)

complaint.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Clarke,
dispense

No.

7:14-cv-00124-MFU

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

(W.D.

Va.

because

presented

in

May
the
the

have

Hoye v.

27,

2015).

We

facts

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3