Bryan Keith Richardson v. Charles William
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00129-GMG-JSK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999730614]. Mailed to: Bryan Keith Richardson UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY BEAUMONT P. O. Box 26030 Beaumont, TX 77720-6030. [15-7033]
Appeal: 15-7033
Doc: 13
Filed: 01/06/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7033
BRYAN KEITH RICHARDSON,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
CHARLES WILLIAMS, Warden FCI Gilmer,
Respondent – Appellee,
and
ASSOCIATE WARDEN FERGUSON; DEBBIE J. LOHR, DHO hearing
officer; LIEUTENANT PRINCE; RUSSELL A. PERDUE, Warden of
FCI Gilmer,
Respondents.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief
District Judge. (3:14-cv-00129-GMG-JSK)
Submitted:
December 18, 2015
Decided:
January 6, 2016
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bryan Keith Richardson, Appellant
Altmeyer, Assistant United States
Pro Se.
Attorney,
Helen Campbell
Wheeling, West
Appeal: 15-7033
Doc: 13
Filed: 01/06/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Virginia; Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney,
Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-7033
Doc: 13
Filed: 01/06/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Bryan
district
magistrate
(2012)
Keith
Richardson,
court’s
judge
order
and
petition.
reversible error.
by
the
We
a
federal
accepting
denying
have
the
relief
reviewed
prisoner,
appeals
recommendation
on
his
the
28
of
U.S.C.
record
and
the
the
§ 2241
find
no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
district
court.
Richardson
v.
Williams,
3:14-cv-00129-GMG-JSK (N.D. W. Va. June 26, 2015).
No.
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?