Omeako Brisbon v. Laticia Owen
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03282-H. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999728091]. Mailed to: Omeako Brisbon. [15-7037]
Appeal: 15-7037
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/31/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7037
OMEAKO L. BRISBON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LATICIA
OWENS,
Head
Nurse;
MARY
LOCKLEAR,
Superintendent; BRAD PERRITT, Superintendent,
Assistant
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:14-ct-03282-H)
Submitted:
November 23, 2015
Decided:
December 31, 2015
Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Omeako L. Brisbon, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7037
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/31/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Omeako
L.
Brisbon
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b)(1) (2012).
reversible
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
However,
under
the
circumstances
of
this
case, we conclude that the district court should have dismissed
Brisbon’s complaint without prejudice.
Accordingly, we affirm
the dismissal order, with the modification that the dismissal is
without prejudice.
See Brisbon v. Owens, No. 5:14-ct-03282-H
(E.D.N.C.
2015).
June
24,
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?