Mike Settle v. Michael Slager
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-01802-RMG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Mike Settle. [15-7052]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff – Appellant,
MICHAEL SLAGER, sued in their individual and
capacities; NORTH CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT,
their individual and official capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
Richard M. Gergel, District
November 23, 2015
January 15, 2016
Before MOTZ, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mike Settle, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Mike Settle appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the
First, Settle’s consent
magistrate judge for a non-dispositive ruling, and the district
court appropriately conducted a de novo review of those portions
of the report to which Settle objected.
See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)
Moreover, as the district court held, Settle has no
standing to assert the constitutional rights of a third party,
see Archuleta v. McShan, 897 F.2d 495, 497 (10th Cir. 1990), and
his state claim is likewise meritless.
Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
Settle v. Slager,
No. 2:15-cv-01802-RMG (D.S.C. June 22, 2015).
We dispense with
argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?