Paul Lovings v. Randall Mathena
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:14-cv-00359-JLK-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999703365]. Mailed to: Paul Lovings. [15-7057]
Appeal: 15-7057
Doc: 13
Filed: 11/20/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7057
PAUL A. LOVINGS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RANDALL C. MATHENA, Warden of Red Onion State Prison;
OFFICER D.C. DUPIE; OFFICER J.L. DOOLEY; SERGEANT BARTON;
SERGEANT L. COLLINS; SERGEANT TOHIA PHILLIPS; SERGEANT B.P.
MEADE; LIEUTENANT DAY; LIEUTENANT T.G. LYALL; UNIT MANAGER
W.G. SWINEY; NURSE MS. CLARK; OFFICER R.J. SLUSS; LIEUTENANT
JAMES D. LAMBERT; COUNSELOR S. M. MULLINS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:14-cv-00359-JLK-RSB)
Submitted:
November 17, 2015
Decided:
November 20, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul A. Lovings, Appellant Pro Se.
Margaret Hoehl O’Shea,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellees.
_______________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7057
Doc: 13
Filed: 11/20/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Paul A. Lovings appeals the district court’s order denying
relief
on
his
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2012)
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We
have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Lovings
v. Mathena, No. 7:14-cv-00359-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. June 19, 2015).
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?