Paul Lovings v. Randall Mathena

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:14-cv-00359-JLK-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999703365]. Mailed to: Paul Lovings. [15-7057]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7057 Doc: 13 Filed: 11/20/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7057 PAUL A. LOVINGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RANDALL C. MATHENA, Warden of Red Onion State Prison; OFFICER D.C. DUPIE; OFFICER J.L. DOOLEY; SERGEANT BARTON; SERGEANT L. COLLINS; SERGEANT TOHIA PHILLIPS; SERGEANT B.P. MEADE; LIEUTENANT DAY; LIEUTENANT T.G. LYALL; UNIT MANAGER W.G. SWINEY; NURSE MS. CLARK; OFFICER R.J. SLUSS; LIEUTENANT JAMES D. LAMBERT; COUNSELOR S. M. MULLINS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:14-cv-00359-JLK-RSB) Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 20, 2015 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul A. Lovings, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl O’Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. _______________ Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7057 Doc: 13 Filed: 11/20/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Paul A. Lovings appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lovings v. Mathena, No. 7:14-cv-00359-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. June 19, 2015). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?