Demar Worrell v. Sergeant Spark

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [999628620-2] Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03092-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999762038]. Mailed to: Demar Worrell. [15-7059]

Appeal: 15-7059

Doc: 21

Filed: 02/25/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7059

DEMAR WORRELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
and
ANTHONY VELASQUEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
SERGEANT SPARKS; SERGEANT WINN,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
WAYNE COUNTY JAIL,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:14-ct-03092-D)

Submitted:

November 23, 2015

Decided:

February 25, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 15-7059

Doc: 21

Filed: 02/25/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

Demar Worrell, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Christopher Hart,
SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART PA, New Bern, North
Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-7059

Doc: 21

Filed: 02/25/2016

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Demar Worrell appeals the district court’s orders granting
summary judgment to defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint and denying reconsideration.
record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the

Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court.

Worrell v. Sergeant

Sparks, No. 5:14-ct-03092-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 24, 2015 & June 11,
2015).

We

dispense

with

contentions

deny

are

Worrell’s

oral

motion

argument

adequately

for

because

presented

in

medical
the
the

facts

records

and

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3