Joseph Coppola v. Terry O'Brien


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999629746-2]; denying motion to appoint counsel [999626667-2]; denying motion to stay transfer pending appeal [999629743-2] Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00013-JPB-JES. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999661890]. Mailed to: J. Coppola. [15-7060]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7060 Doc: 15 Filed: 09/17/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7060 JOSEPH COPPOLA, Petitioner - Appellant, v. TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (2:14-cv-00013-JPB-JES) Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: September 17, 2015 Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Coppola, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7060 Doc: 15 Filed: 09/17/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Coppola, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s judge order and denying petition. error. the relief recommendation on his 28 of the U.S.C. magistrate § 2241 (2012) We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, court. Va. accepting June we affirm for the reasons stated by the district Coppola v. O’Brien, No. 2:14-cv-00013-JPB-JES (N.D. W. 17, 2015). We deny Coppola’s pending motions for appointment of counsel and to stay his transfer pending appeal. We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?