Joseph Coppola v. Terry O'Brien
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999629746-2]; denying motion to appoint counsel [999626667-2]; denying motion to stay transfer pending appeal [999629743-2] Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00013-JPB-JES. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999661890]. Mailed to: J. Coppola. [15-7060]
Appeal: 15-7060
Doc: 15
Filed: 09/17/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7060
JOSEPH COPPOLA,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins.
John Preston Bailey,
District Judge. (2:14-cv-00013-JPB-JES)
Submitted:
August 20, 2015
Decided:
September 17, 2015
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Coppola, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7060
Doc: 15
Filed: 09/17/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Coppola, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s
judge
order
and
denying
petition.
error.
the
relief
recommendation
on
his
28
of
the
U.S.C.
magistrate
§ 2241
(2012)
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis,
court.
Va.
accepting
June
we
affirm
for
the
reasons
stated
by
the
district
Coppola v. O’Brien, No. 2:14-cv-00013-JPB-JES (N.D. W.
17,
2015).
We
deny
Coppola’s
pending
motions
for
appointment of counsel and to stay his transfer pending appeal.
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?