James Roudabush, Jr. v. Milano

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to file addendum to informal opening brief out of time [999642278-2] Originating case number: 2:13-cv-00581-RBS-TEM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999727195]. Mailed to: James Roudabush, Jr. [15-7074]

Appeal: 15-7074

Doc: 19

Filed: 12/30/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7074

JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MILANO, Captain; LT. M. JOSIAH; SGT. F. MENSAH; LT.
REA;
ANDERSON; D/S H. MONIR; D. HALL; JANE DOE, Nurse; CHARLIE,
Paramedic at ADC,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
FOX; C. M. HILTON,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:13-cv-00581-RBS-TEM)

Submitted:

November 24, 2015

Decided:

December 30, 2015

Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Lester Roudabush, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Alexander
Francuzenko, COOK CRAIG & FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia;

Appeal: 15-7074

Doc: 19

Ruth Griggs,
Appellees.

Filed: 12/30/2015

SANDS

Pg: 2 of 3

ANDERSON,

PC,

Richmond,

Virginia,

for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-7074

Doc: 19

Filed: 12/30/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order

dismissing

We have

reviewed

his

42

U.S.C.

the

record

§ 1983

and

find

(2012)
no

civil

reversible

action.
error.

Accordingly, although we grant Roudabush’s motion to file an
addendum
reasons

to

his

stated

by

informal
the

opening

district

brief,

court.

we

affirm

Roudabush

No. 2:13-cv-00581-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. June 23, 2015).

for

v.

the

Milano,

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3