Terah C. Morris v. A. McLane
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01426-GBL-MSN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Terah C. Morris RED ONION STATE PRISON 10800 H. Jack Rose Highway P. O. Box 970 Pound, VA 24279-0000. [15-7104]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
TERAH C. MORRIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
A. MCLANE, Correctional Officer; C. L. GOINES, Correctional
Officer; W. PIXLEY, Warden; HAROLD CLARKE, Director of VA
Prisons/D.O.C.; CAIN, Lt.; F. CARVER, Sgt.; PITTMAN;
KILLMON; BROWN; D. CLARK,
Defendants – Appellees,
C. GOINES, Correctional Officer; WENDALL PIXLEY, Warden,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
September 29, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terah C. Morris, Appellant Pro Se.
October 5, 2015
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
prejudice for failure to comply with its prior order.
R. Civ. P. 41(b).
abuse of discretion.
(4th Cir. 1989).
We review the district court’s order for
Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95-96
“A court abuses its discretion if its decision
is guided by erroneous legal principles or rests upon a clearly
erroneous factual finding.”
United States v. McLean, 715 F.3d
129, 142 (4th Cir. 2013) (internal quotation marks omitted).
The district court dismissed Morris’ complaint because it found
that Morris had not filed a particularized amended complaint or
an affidavit concerning administrative exhaustion of his claims,
as the court had instructed him to do.
record and find no abuse of discretion.
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
Morris v. McLane,
No. 1:14-cv-01426-GBL-MSN (E.D. Va. June 18, 2015).
with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are
argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?