US v. Clyde Whitley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--terminating Motion to seal [999681881-2], terminating Motion to seal [999629619-3], terminating Motion to seal [999629616-3]; denying Motion for other relief [999645332-2]; denying Motion to amend/correct [999629619-2], denying Motion to amend/correct [999629616-2] Originating case number: 5:07-cr-00080-FL-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999684741]. Mailed to: Whitley. [15-7177]

Appeal: 15-7177

Doc: 16

Filed: 10/23/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7177

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLYDE KIRBY WHITLEY,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:07-cr-00080-FL-1)

Submitted:

October 20, 2015

Decided:

October 23, 2015

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clyde Kirby Whitley, Appellant Pro Se.
Jane J. Jackson,
Assistant United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7177

Doc: 16

Filed: 10/23/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Clyde

Kirby

Whitley

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction and related motions.
find

no

reversible

error.

We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,

we

deny

Whitley’s

motions to amend and for mandamus relief and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.

United States v. Whitley,

No. 5:07-cr-00080-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. July 8, 2015).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2