US v. Clyde Whitley


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--terminating Motion to seal [999681881-2], terminating Motion to seal [999629619-3], terminating Motion to seal [999629616-3]; denying Motion for other relief [999645332-2]; denying Motion to amend/correct [999629619-2], denying Motion to amend/correct [999629616-2] Originating case number: 5:07-cr-00080-FL-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999684741]. Mailed to: Whitley. [15-7177]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7177 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/23/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7177 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLYDE KIRBY WHITLEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:07-cr-00080-FL-1) Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clyde Kirby Whitley, Appellant Pro Se. Jane J. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7177 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/23/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Clyde Kirby Whitley appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction and related motions. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we deny Whitley’s motions to amend and for mandamus relief and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Whitley, No. 5:07-cr-00080-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. July 8, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?