US v. Randle Cooke

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999635072-2] Originating case number: 5:09-hc-02034-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999721027].. [15-7199]

Appeal: 15-7199

Doc: 21

Filed: 12/18/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7199

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner - Appellee,
v.
RANDLE PORTER COOKE,
Respondent - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:09-hc-02034-FL)

Submitted:

December 15, 2015

Before GREGORY
Circuit Judge.

and

FLOYD,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

December 18, 2015

and

DAVIS,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James B. Craven, III, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Michael Bredenberg, Special Assistant United States Attorney, G.
Norman Acker, III, Matthew Fesak, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorneys, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7199

Doc: 21

Filed: 12/18/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Randle

Porter

Cooke

appeals

the

district

denying his motion for a review hearing.
record and find no reversible error.

court’s

order

We have reviewed the

Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court.

United States v.

Cooke, No. 5:09-hc-02034-FL (E.D.N.C. July 8, 2015).

We deny

Cooke’s motion for the appointment of counsel.

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2