US v. Noe Pineda-Albarron

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:10-cr-00029-NKM-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999745557]. Mailed to: Noe Pineda-Albarron D. RAY JAMES CORRECTIONAL FACILITY P. O. Box 2000 Folkston, GA 31537. [15-7204]

Appeal: 15-7204

Doc: 8

Filed: 02/01/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7204

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NOE PINEDA-ALBARRON, a/k/a Primo,
Flores, a/k/a Noe Albarron-Pineda,

a/k/a

Pedro

Martinez

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville.
Norman K. Moon,
Senior District Judge. (3:10-cr-00029-NKM-1)

Submitted:

January 26, 2016

Decided:

February 1, 2016

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Noe Pineda-Albarron, Appellant Pro Se.
Donald Ray Wolthuis,
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Roanoke,
Virginia,
for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7204

Doc: 8

Filed: 02/01/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Noe

Pineda-Albarron

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

United States v. Pineda-Albarron, No. 3:10-cr-00029-NKM-

1 (W.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2015).

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2