Jeff Farmer v. MHM Maryland, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999646158-2], denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999748523-2]; denying Motion to reconsider [999748523-5]; denying Motion to amend/correct [999748523-4]; denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal (FRAP 8) [999748523-3]. Originating case number: 8:14-cv-03080-PWG. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999763822]. Mailed to: Appellant. [15-7220]

Appeal: 15-7220

Doc: 23

Filed: 02/29/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7220

JEFF FARMER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MHM MARYLAND, INC.; DR. VINCENT SIRACUSANO; DR. HOWARD PENN,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:14cv-03080-PWG)

Submitted:

February 25, 2016

Decided:

February 29, 2015

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeff Farmer, Appellant Pro Se.
Ronald McGlenn Cherry, BONNER
KIERNAN TREBACH & CROCIATA LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7220

Doc: 23

Filed: 02/29/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Jeff Farmer appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.

We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Farmer’s
motions to reexamine filing in forma pauperis, for appointment of
counsel, for injunctive relief, and to amend the complaint, and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Farmer v.

MHM Md., Inc., No. 8:14-cv-03080-PWG (D. Md. July 2, 2015).

We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2