US v. Jermaine Brown

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-10,4:13-cv-00041-RBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999723274].. [15-7223]

Appeal: 15-7223

Doc: 8

Filed: 12/22/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7223

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JERMAINE BROWN, a/k/a Jeezy,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News.
Rebecca Beach Smith,
Chief District Judge. (4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-10; 4:13-cv-00041RBS)

Submitted:

December 17, 2015

Decided:

December 22, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jermaine Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Timothy Richard Murphy,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, Kristine Elizabeth
Wolfe, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News,
Virginia; Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Assistant United States
Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7223

Doc: 8

Filed: 12/22/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Jermaine

Brown

appeals

from

the

district

court’s

orders

construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as an unauthorized
successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it on
that basis, and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

United States v. Brown, Nos. 4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-10;

4:13-cv-00041-RBS (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2015; June 8, 2015).
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2