Calvin Wedington v. U.S. Federal Government
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999644615-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999637507-2] Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03319-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999681643]. Mailed to: Wedington. [15-7226]
Appeal: 15-7226
Doc: 12
Filed: 10/20/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7226
CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
U.S. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, and its affiliated and subsidiary
organizations, officials, and representatives; WARDEN ART
BEELER; UNKNOWN DEPUTY U.S. MARSHAL; NURSE BEASLEY; U.S.
MARSHAL SERVICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03319-F)
Submitted:
October 15, 2015
Decided:
October 20, 2015
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Calvin Scott Wedington, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7226
Doc: 12
Filed: 10/20/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Calvin Scott Wedington appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action as frivolous.
our
review
to
the
issues
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
raised
in
On appeal, we confine
the
Appellant’s
brief.
Because Wedington’s informal brief does
not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition,
Wedington has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
Accordingly,
although
pauperis,
affirm
we
we
the
grant
district
leave
to
court’s
proceed
judgment.
in
We
forma
deny
Wedington’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?