Calvin Wedington v. U.S. Federal Government

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999644615-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999637507-2] Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03319-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999681643]. Mailed to: Wedington. [15-7226]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7226 Doc: 12 Filed: 10/20/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7226 CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, and its affiliated and subsidiary organizations, officials, and representatives; WARDEN ART BEELER; UNKNOWN DEPUTY U.S. MARSHAL; NURSE BEASLEY; U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:14-ct-03319-F) Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 20, 2015 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Calvin Scott Wedington, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7226 Doc: 12 Filed: 10/20/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Calvin Scott Wedington appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action as frivolous. our review to the issues See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). raised in On appeal, we confine the Appellant’s brief. Because Wedington’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Wedington has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, although pauperis, affirm we we the grant district leave to court’s proceed judgment. in We forma deny Wedington’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?