Ronald Bishop, Sr. v. Betty Johnson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to amend/correct [999670517-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999667265-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-02300-JKB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999771493]. Mailed to: Ronald Bishop, Sr.. [15-7230]
Appeal: 15-7230
Doc: 18
Filed: 03/10/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7230
MR. RONALD BISHOP, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BETTY JOHNSON, Warden; LT. JAMES SIMMONS; CHANTELL SESSIONS,
CCMS II; COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONS; KEISHA TORNEY,
Correctional Case Management Specialist (CCMS II); OFFICER
ALOAD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-02300-JKB)
Submitted:
January 29, 2016
Decided:
March 10, 2016
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Bishop, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Ankush Nayar, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7230
Doc: 18
Filed: 03/10/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald
Bishop,
Sr.,
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Bishop v. Johnson, No. 1:14-cv-02300-JKB (D. Md. filed
July 13, 2015 & entered July 14, 2015).
We deny his motions to
appoint counsel and to amend his complaint and dispense with
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
contentions
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?