Ronald Bishop, Sr. v. Betty Johnson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to amend/correct [999670517-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999667265-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-02300-JKB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999771493]. Mailed to: Ronald Bishop, Sr.. [15-7230]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7230 Doc: 18 Filed: 03/10/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7230 MR. RONALD BISHOP, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BETTY JOHNSON, Warden; LT. JAMES SIMMONS; CHANTELL SESSIONS, CCMS II; COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONS; KEISHA TORNEY, Correctional Case Management Specialist (CCMS II); OFFICER ALOAD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:14-cv-02300-JKB) Submitted: January 29, 2016 Decided: March 10, 2016 Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Bishop, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Ankush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7230 Doc: 18 Filed: 03/10/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Ronald Bishop, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bishop v. Johnson, No. 1:14-cv-02300-JKB (D. Md. filed July 13, 2015 & entered July 14, 2015). We deny his motions to appoint counsel and to amend his complaint and dispense with oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?