US v. James Webb

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:12-cr-00301-D-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999711220]. Mailed to: James Thomas Webb. [15-7240]

Appeal: 15-7240

Doc: 9

Filed: 12/03/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7240

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES THOMAS WEBB,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever III,
Chief District Judge. (5:12-cr-00301-D-1)

Submitted:

December 1, 2015

Before SHEDD and
Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

December 3, 2015

and

DAVIS,

Senior

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Thomas Webb, Appellant Pro Se.
Jennifer P. May-Parker,
Assistant United States Attorney, Kristine L. Fritz, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7240

Doc: 9

Filed: 12/03/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
James

Thomas

Webb

seeks

to

appeal

the

district

order denying his motion for release pending appeal.

court’s
At the

time that Webb filed the motion, our mandate had issued in his
direct

appeal

from

his

conviction

and

sentence,

and

he

had

received an extension from the Supreme Court to file a petition
for certiorari.

In his motion for release pending appeal, Webb

asserted that he would be filing a petition for certiorari and
asked to be released pending a decision in his case.

The period

for Webb to file his petition for certiorari has now expired,
and he has not filed a petition.

Accordingly, since his direct

appeal is no longer pending, we dismiss this appeal as moot.
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2