US v. James Webb

Filing

Case reopened upon grant of rehearing/rehearing en banc. Originating case number: 5:12-cr-00301-D-1. [15-7240]

Appeal: 15-7240

Doc: 15

Filed: 01/20/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

ON REHEARING
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7240

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES THOMAS WEBB,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever III,
Chief District Judge. (5:12-cr-00301-D-1)

Submitted:

January 8, 2016

Before SHEDD and
Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

January 20, 2016

and

DAVIS,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Thomas Webb, Appellant Pro Se.
Jennifer P. May-Parker,
Assistant United States Attorney, Kristine L. Fritz, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7240

Doc: 15

Filed: 01/20/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
James

Thomas

Webb

appeals

the

district

denying his motion for release pending appeal.
dismissed the appeal as moot.
panel rehearing.
rehearing.

court’s

order

We previously

Webb has now filed a petition for

Upon review of the petition, we grant panel

On rehearing, we have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court.

See United States v. Webb, No.

5:12-cr-00301-D-1 (E.D.N.C. filed July 30, 2015; entered July
31, 2015).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2