Benjamin K. Quarmon v. Jeffrey Dillman

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00210-MSD-TEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999705892]. Mailed to: Benjamin K. Quarmon RSW REGIONAL JAIL 6601 Winchester Road Front Royal, VA 22630. [15-7261]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7261 Doc: 17 Filed: 11/24/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7261 BENJAMIN K. QUARMON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JEFFREY DILLMAN, Warden, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:15-cv-00210-MSD-TEM) Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin K. Quarmon, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7261 Doc: 17 Filed: 11/24/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Benjamin K. Quarmon seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action. over final This court may exercise jurisdiction only orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). Because the deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied by the filing of an seeks amended to complaint, appeal is we neither conclude a final interlocutory or collateral order. that the order order nor an Quarmon appealable Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, jurisdiction. we dismiss the appeal for lack of We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?