Antonio Cain v. Martinez


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999662501-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00968-TSE-IDD. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999725051]. Mailed to: Antonio Cain. [15-7269]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7269 Doc: 16 Filed: 12/28/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7269 ANTONIO CAIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CPL. MARTINEZ, Correctional facility/CO; OFFICER RIDEOUT, Riverside Regional Jail/correctional officer; SGT. WHORLEY, Riverside Regional Jail/correctional officer; RIVERSIDE REGIONAL JAIL, correctional facility; SGT. RONNEY, Riverside Regional Jail/correctional jail, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-00968-TSE-IDD) Submitted: December 11, 2015 Decided: December 28, 2015 Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Cain, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7269 Doc: 16 Filed: 12/28/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Antonio Cain appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Cain’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cain v. Martinez, No. 1:15-cv-00968-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?