US v. Clifton Jermaine Swinton

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999702015-2]; denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999656809-2] Originating case number: 4:09-cr-01145-TLW-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999705808]. Mailed to: Swinton. [15-7274]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7274 Doc: 9 Filed: 11/24/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7274 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLIFTON JERMAINE SWINTON, a/k/a Compton, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (4:09-cr-01145-TLW-1) Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clifton Jermaine Swinton, Appellant Pro Se. Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Carolina, for Appellee. Arthur Bradley Florence, South Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7274 Doc: 9 Filed: 11/24/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Clifton Jermaine Swinton appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (D.S.C. United July States 29, v. 2015). Swinton, We deny No. 4:09-cr-01145-TLW-1 Swinton’s motions for a transcript at government expense and to appoint counsel, and dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?