US v. Courtney Gilmore

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:09-cr-00501-JFA-6. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999681548]. Mailed to: Appellant. [15-7279]

Appeal: 15-7279

Doc: 6

Filed: 10/20/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7279

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
COURTNEY MARKEE GILMORE, a/k/a Dust,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (3:09-cr-00501-JFA-6)

Submitted:

October 15, 2015

Decided:

October 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Courtney Markee Gilmore, Appellant Pro Se.
Stacey Denise
Haynes, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7279

Doc: 6

Filed: 10/20/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Courtney Markee Gilmore appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction under Guidelines
Amendment

782.

reversible error.

We

have

the

record

and

find

no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.
00501-JFA-6

reviewed

(D.S.C.

United States v. Gilmore, No. 3:09-cr-

July

29,

2015).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2