US v. Marquel Riley
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:02-cr-00548-CMC-18 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999723309].. [15-7281]
Appeal: 15-7281
Doc: 9
Filed: 12/22/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7281
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARQUEL DUSHUAN RILEY, a/k/a Mark Riley,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior
District Judge. (3:02-cr-00548-CMC-18)
Submitted:
December 17, 2015
Decided:
December 22, 2015
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marquel Dushuan Riley, Appellant Pro Se.
Beth Drake, Jane
Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7281
Doc: 9
Filed: 12/22/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Marquel Dushuan Riley appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence
reduction
Riley
motion
under
also
for
Amendment
appeals
the
782
to
district
reconsideration
of
the
Sentencing
court’s
its
order
order
Guidelines.
granting
denying
a
reduction, but again refusing a sentence reduction.
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
abuse
of
discretion
his
sentence
We have
in
the
district court’s decision to deny Riley a sentence reduction.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders denying a
sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?