US v. Marquel Riley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:02-cr-00548-CMC-18 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999723309].. [15-7281]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7281 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/22/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7281 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MARQUEL DUSHUAN RILEY, a/k/a Mark Riley, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:02-cr-00548-CMC-18) Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marquel Dushuan Riley, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7281 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/22/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Marquel Dushuan Riley appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction Riley motion under also for Amendment appeals the 782 to district reconsideration of the Sentencing court’s its order order Guidelines. granting denying a reduction, but again refusing a sentence reduction. reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion his sentence We have in the district court’s decision to deny Riley a sentence reduction. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders denying a sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?