US v. Otis Samuel, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:13-cr-00321-RBH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999723298]. Mailed to: Samuel. [15-7292]
Appeal: 15-7292
Doc: 7
Filed: 12/22/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7292
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
OTIS SAMUEL, JR., a/k/a O,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:13-cr-00321-RBH-1)
Submitted:
December 17, 2015
Decided:
December 22, 2015
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Otis Samuel, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Alfred William Walker
Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7292
Doc: 7
Filed: 12/22/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Otis
denying
Samuel,
Samuel’s
Jr.,
18
appeals
U.S.C.
the
district
§ 3582(c)(2)
court’s
(2012)
motion
order
for
sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing
Guidelines Manual (2014).
no
reversible
court’s order.
error.
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly,
we
affirm
the
district
United States v. Samuel, No. 4:13–cr–00321–RBH–1
(D.S.C. July 24, 2015); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d
337,
340
(4th
Cir.
2011).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?