US v. Hector Portillo

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for summary disposition (Local Rule 27(f)) [999700729-2]. Originating case number: 1:95-cr-00522-LMB-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999744741]. Mailed to: Appellant and Bernard Apperson, III. [15-7299]

Appeal: 15-7299

Doc: 12

Filed: 01/29/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7299

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HECTOR DAVID PORTILLO,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:95-cr-00522-LMB-1)

Submitted:

January 8, 2016

Decided:

January 29, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hector David Portillo, Appellant Pro Se.
Bernard James
Apperson, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7299

Doc: 12

Filed: 01/29/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Hector David Portillo appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction pursuant to Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 782.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

See United States v. Portillo, No. 1:95-cr-00522-LMB-1

(E.D. Va. July 7, 2015).
disposition.

We deny Portillo’s motion for summary

We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2