Lamont Parker v. US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999682211-2]. Originating case number: 5:14-hc-02214-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999763988]. Mailed to: Lamont Parker. [15-7318]
Appeal: 15-7318
Doc: 11
Filed: 02/29/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7318
LAMONT DELMAR PARKER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:14-hc-02214-BO)
Submitted:
February 25, 2016
Before SHEDD and
Circuit Judge.
HARRIS,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
February 29, 2016
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lamont Delmar Parker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7318
Doc: 11
Filed: 02/29/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Lamont
Delmar
Parker
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing Parker’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition for a writ
of habeas corpus.
On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Because Parker’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for
the district court’s disposition, Parker has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order.
Accordingly, although we grant
Parker leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm
the district court’s judgment.
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?