US v. Reginald McKinnon

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:14-cr-00259-RBH-8 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999703278]. Mailed to: Reginald McKinnon FCI WILLIAMSBURG FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 340 Salters, SC 29590-0000. [15-7321]

Appeal: 15-7321

Doc: 7

Filed: 11/20/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7321

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
REGINALD MCKINNON, a/k/a Reg, a/k/a Big Reggie,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:14-cr-00259-RBH-8)

Submitted:

November 17, 2015

Decided:

November 20, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald McKinnon, Appellant Pro Se.
Alfred William Walker
Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7321

Doc: 7

Filed: 11/20/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Reginald

McKinnon

appeals

the

district

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012) motion.
the record and find no reversible error.

court’s

order

We have reviewed

Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court.

United States v.

McKinnon, No. 4:14-cr-00259-RBH-8 (D.S.C. Aug. 6, 2015).
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2