Tyrone Roberson v. Anthony Padula

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-01872-RMG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999785684]. Mailed to: Tyrone Roberson. [15-7329]

Appeal: 15-7329

Doc: 22

Filed: 03/31/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7329

TYRONE LAMAR ROBERSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ANTHONY J. PADULA, Warden Lee Corrections Institution;
LIEUTENANT A. DAVIS; MS. FULTON, Medical Health Care
Provider RN; RN MS. JUDY RABON; RN MS. MCDONALD; J. MCREE,
MD, KCI Pharmacy; JUANITA MOSS, Food Service Supervisor;
MS. BELL, Food Service Supervisor; MS. NORMAN, Food Service
Supervisor; MS. ANDERSON, Food Service Supervisor,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MAJOR JAMES DEAN;
LIEUTENANT ERNEST MIMS; SERGEANT B. COOK; SERGEANT K.
ARENS; MS. KELA E. THOMAS, Commission of Probation Parole
and Pardon Services Director; WILLIAM BYARS, JR., SCDC
Director, et al; SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BUDGET AND CONTROL
BOARD COMMITTEE; WILLIAM F. MARSCHER, III, SC Commission on
Indigent Defense; FREDERICK M. CORLEY, Esquire; RANDOLPH
MURDAUGH, III, Solicitor Attorney for the State; WILLIAM T.
HOWELL, Judge of the 14th Judicial Circuit Court of SC,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (2:13-cv-01872-RMG)

Submitted:

March 29, 2016

Decided:

March 31, 2016

Appeal: 15-7329

Doc: 22

Filed: 03/31/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Lamar Roberson, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Parker McLean,
CLARKE, JOHNSON, PETERSON & MCLEAN, PA, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-7329

Doc: 22

Filed: 03/31/2016

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Lamar Roberson appeals the district court’s order
adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge
and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
July 22,

Roberson
2015).

v.
In

Padula,

No.

addition,

we

raised for the first time on appeal.
1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993).

2:13-cv-01872-RMG
decline

to

(D.S.C.

address

claims

See Muth v. United States,

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3