US v. Edgardo Barron-Espinosa

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cr-00259-F-2. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999738542]. Mailed to: Edgardo Barron-Espinosa. [15-7353]

Appeal: 15-7353

Doc: 6

Filed: 01/20/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7353

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EDGARDO BARRON-ESPINOSA,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:13-cr-00259-F-2)

Submitted:

January 14, 2016

Decided:

January 20, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edgardo Barron-Espinosa, Appellant Pro Se.
Jennifer P. MayParker, Brian Scott Meyers, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7353

Doc: 6

Filed: 01/20/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Edgardo Barron-Espinosa appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582 (2012).
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.
00259-F-2

United States v. Barron-Espinosa, No. 5:13-cr-

(E.D.N.C.

Sept.

3,

2015). *

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

*

To the extent that Barron-Espinosa seeks to appeal from his
conviction and sentence imposed on September 4, 2014, because we
have previously affirmed this criminal judgment, United States v.
Barron-Espinosa, 608 F. App’x 140 (4th Cir. 2015) (No. 14-4730),
we dismiss the appeal as duplicative and untimely.
2