Stanley Moultrie v. William Byars, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 9:14-cv-01690-DCN. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999763941]. Mailed to: S. Moultrie. [15-7358]
Appeal: 15-7358
Doc: 14
Filed: 02/29/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7358
STANLEY LEE MOULTRIE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM BYARS, JR., South Carolina Department of Corrections
Director; BRYAN P. STIRLING; GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY; ATTORNEY
GENERAL ALAN WILSON; DEPUTY DIRECTOR ROBERT WARD; SCDC GENERAL
COUNSEL DAYNE HAILE; CHRISTOPHER FLORIAN; ANN HALLMAN, Agency
Grievance
Coordinator;
MARIA
LEGGINS,
Agency
Mailroom
Coordinator; WILLIE EAGLETON, Evan Warden; ASSOCIATE WARDEN
MCFADDEN; MAJOR C. WEST; BETHEA LT. MICHAEL TOMS; MS. BAKER,
Mailroom Coordinator; MS. GRAVES, ECI Grievance Coordinator;
PAMELA MCDOWELL, Mailroom Supervisor; LT. JAMES MARTIN; SGT. H.
SIMS; ASSOCIATE WARDEN BUSH, Lee CI; ASSOCIATE WARDEN NOLAN;
ASSOCIATE WARDEN DEAN; K. RIVERS, Lee CI Grievance Coordinator;
JIMMY SLEIGH; DEPUTY WARDEN; LT. JACK BROWN; MS. CONYERS, Lee CI
Officer; GENERAL COUNSEL TATARSKY; DEPUTY DIRECTOR MCCALL; AMY
SMITH; D. EASTRIDGE; FELICIA MCQUEEN; SANDRA BOWIE; DEPUTY
WARDEN DAVIS; CAPTAIN THOMAS; MS. WILSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort.
David C. Norton, District Judge.
(9:14-cv-01690-DCN)
Submitted:
February 25, 2016
Before SHEDD and
Circuit Judge.
HARRIS,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
February 29, 2016
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Appeal: 15-7358
Doc: 14
Filed: 02/29/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley Lee Moultrie, Appellant Pro Se.
Jerome Scott Kozacki,
WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-7358
Doc: 14
Filed: 02/29/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Stanley
adopting
Lee
the
Moultrie
magistrate
appeals
the
judge’s
district
recommendation
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
confine
our
brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
brief
does
not
disposition,
court’s
before
to
the
challenge
Moultrie
order.
judgment.
legal
review
has
issues
the
raised
in
and
order
denying
On appeal, we
the
appellant’s
Because Moultrie’s informal
basis
for
forfeited
Accordingly,
court’s
we
the
district
appellate
affirm
the
review
district
court’s
of
the
court’s
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?