US v. Arthur Niles
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:01-cr-00198-CWH-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999775397]. Mailed to: Arthur Laron Niles. [15-7366]
Appeal: 15-7366
Doc: 12
Filed: 03/16/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7366
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ARTHUR LARON NILES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.
C. Weston Houck, Senior District
Judge. (4:01-cr-00198-CWH-1)
Submitted:
January 26, 2016
Decided:
March 16, 2016
Before WYNN, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur Laron Niles, Appellant Pro Se.
Alfred William Walker
Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7366
Doc: 12
Filed: 03/16/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Arthur
denying
his
Laron
18
Niles
U.S.C.
appeals
§ 3582(c)
denying reconsideration. *
no reversible error.
dispense
with
contentions
are
(2012)
motion
court’s
order
and
order
its
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
(D.S.C.
oral
district
We have reviewed the record and find
stated by the district court.
cr-00198-CWH-1
the
Dec.
United States v. Niles, No. 4:0128,
argument
adequately
2012;
because
presented
in
Aug.
the
the
18,
2015).
We
facts
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
We decline to sua sponte dismiss Niles’ appeal of these
orders as untimely. Rice v. Rivera, 617 F.3d 802, 810 (4th Cir.
2010); United States v. Urutyan, 564 F.3d 679, 685 (4th Cir.
2009); United States v. Mitchell, 518 F.3d 740, 744, 750 (10th
Cir. 2008).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?