US v. Arthur Niles

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:01-cr-00198-CWH-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999775397]. Mailed to: Arthur Laron Niles. [15-7366]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7366 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/16/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7366 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ARTHUR LARON NILES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:01-cr-00198-CWH-1) Submitted: January 26, 2016 Decided: March 16, 2016 Before WYNN, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arthur Laron Niles, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7366 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/16/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Arthur denying his Laron 18 Niles U.S.C. appeals § 3582(c) denying reconsideration. * no reversible error. dispense with contentions are (2012) motion court’s order and order its Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons (D.S.C. oral district We have reviewed the record and find stated by the district court. cr-00198-CWH-1 the Dec. United States v. Niles, No. 4:0128, argument adequately 2012; because presented in Aug. the the 18, 2015). We facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * We decline to sua sponte dismiss Niles’ appeal of these orders as untimely. Rice v. Rivera, 617 F.3d 802, 810 (4th Cir. 2010); United States v. Urutyan, 564 F.3d 679, 685 (4th Cir. 2009); United States v. Mitchell, 518 F.3d 740, 744, 750 (10th Cir. 2008). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?