US v. James Robinson
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:02-cr-00080-H-1,5:13-cv-00463-H Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: James Robinson. [15-7371]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
JAMES SCOTT ROBINSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States.
(S. Ct. No. 16-6550)
Submitted: September 28, 2017
Decided: October 17, 2017
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Scott Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
James Scott Robinson appealed the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 (2012) motion as untimely. We affirmed on appeal. United States v. Robinson,
653 F. App’x 779 (4th Cir. 2016). The Supreme Court granted Robinson’s certiorari
petition and has remanded the case to this Court for further consideration in light of
Montgomery v. Louisiana, 136 S. Ct. 718 (2016). Robinson v. United States, 137 S. Ct.
1433 (2017) (Mem.). Because the district court has not yet had the opportunity to assess
the impact of Montgomery on Robinson’s § 2255 motion, we vacate the district court’s
order and remand for further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?