Stephen Chrzan, Jr. v. Paul Butler, Jr.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-ct-03156-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999738571]. Mailed to: Stephen Chrzan, Jr. [15-7378]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7378 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/20/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7378 STEPHEN M. CHRZAN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAUL G. BUTLER, JR., Chairman, NC Parole Commission; WILLIS J. FOWLER, Commissioner; ANTHONY E. RAND, Commissioner; DERRICK E. WADSWORTH, Commissioner, Defendants – Appellees, and PATRICK L. MCCRORY, Governor; BEVERLY PERDUE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:13-ct-03156-BO) Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 20, 2016 Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen M. Chrzan, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jodi Harrison, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Appeal: 15-7378 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/20/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-7378 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/20/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Stephen M. Chrzan, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. May Chrzan v. Butler, No. 5:13-ct-03156-BO (E.D.N.C. filed 29, 2014; dispense with contentions are entered oral May 30, argument adequately 2014 & because presented in July the the 31, 2015). We facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?