US v. Charles Canady

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999658656-2] Originating case number: 7:02-cr-00127-F-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999778164]. Mailed to: Charles Canady. [15-7412]

Appeal: 15-7412

Doc: 14

Filed: 03/21/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7412

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHARLES G. CANADY,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (7:02-cr-00127-F-2)

Submitted:

March 17, 2016

Decided:

March 21, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles G. Canady, Appellant Pro Se.
Edward D. Gray, Ethan A.
Ontjes, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7412

Doc: 14

Filed: 03/21/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Charles G. Canady appeals the district court’s denial of
relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582
(2012).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

United States v. Canady, No. 7:02-cr-00127-F-2

(E.D.N.C. Sept. 3, 2015).

We deny Canady’s motion to appoint

counsel and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
before

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2