William Deaton v. Officer John Doe

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00276-GRA-MGB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999744338]. Mailed to: W Deaton. [15-7413]

Appeal: 15-7413

Doc: 10

Filed: 01/29/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7413

WILLIAM DEATON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
OFFICER JOHN DOE, a/k/a Officer Thomas; LT JOHN DOE, a/k/a
Lt Clauson; LT JOHN DOE, a/k/a Lt Vetter; SGT JOHN DOE;
JANE DOE, Nurse; JANE DOE, Nurse; SGT JANE DOE; SGT JANE
DOE; OFFICER JOHN DOE; OFFICER JOHN DOE; OFFICER JOHN DOE;
JOHN DOE, Nurse; LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; LCDC
MEDICAL PROVIDER; JOHN DOE, Maintenance Supervisor, sued in
their individual and official capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (2:15-cv-00276-GRA-MGB)

Submitted:

January 19, 2016

Decided:

January 29, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Deaton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7413

Doc: 10

Filed: 01/29/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
William
dismissing

Deaton
his

42

appeals
U.S.C.

the

district

§ 1983

(2012)

court’s

orders

complaint

without

prejudice for failure to comply with a court order, and denying
reconsideration.

We

reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by

court.

the

district

have

reviewed

Deaton v.

2:15-cv-00276-GRA-MGB

(D.S.C.

dispense

argument

with

contentions

are

oral

adequately

the

June

and

Officer

John

&

24

4,

because

presented

record

in

Aug.
the
the

facts

find

no

Doe,

No.

2015).

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2