US v. Thurman Young

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:11-cr-00055-AWA-DEM-3 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999753547]. Mailed to: Thurman Young FCI FAIRTON FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 420 Fairton, NJ 08320-0000. [15-7422]

Appeal: 15-7422

Doc: 7

Filed: 02/11/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7422

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
THURMAN YOUNG, a/k/a Charlie,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen,
District Judge. (4:11-cr-00055-AWA-DEM-3)

Submitted:

January 26, 2016

Decided:

February 11, 2016

Before KING and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thurman Young, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Edward Bradenham, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia; Dee
Mullarkey Sterling, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7422

Doc: 7

Filed: 02/11/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Thurman Young appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

United

States v. Young, No. 4:11-cr-00055-AWA-DEM-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 28,
2015).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2