Travis Bouldin v. Harold W. Clarke


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999705145-2], denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999679610-2] Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00264-AWA-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999764983]. Mailed to: Travis Bouldin 1180 Lord Dunmore Drive Virginia Beach, VA 23464. [15-7430]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7430 Doc: 16 Filed: 03/01/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7430 TRAVIS BOULDIN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Douglas E. Miller, Magistrate Judge. (2:15-cv-00264-AWA-DEM) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Circuit Decided: Judges, and March 1, 2016 DAVIS, Senior Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Travis Bouldin, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Catherine Kiernan, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7430 Doc: 16 Filed: 03/01/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Travis Bouldin seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying several motions in his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) matter. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949). The order Bouldin seeks to appeal is neither a final order an nor Accordingly, we appealable deny interlocutory leave to proceed or in collateral forma dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before order. pauperis and We dispense with contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?