Travis Bouldin v. Harold W. Clarke

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999705145-2], denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999679610-2] Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00264-AWA-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999764983]. Mailed to: Travis Bouldin 1180 Lord Dunmore Drive Virginia Beach, VA 23464. [15-7430]

Appeal: 15-7430

Doc: 16

Filed: 03/01/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7430

TRAVIS BOULDIN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of
Corrections,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Douglas E. Miller, Magistrate
Judge. (2:15-cv-00264-AWA-DEM)

Submitted:

February 25, 2016

Before SHEDD and
Circuit Judge.

HARRIS,

Circuit

Decided:

Judges,

and

March 1, 2016

DAVIS,

Senior

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Travis Bouldin, Appellant Pro Se.
Elizabeth Catherine Kiernan,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7430

Doc: 16

Filed: 03/01/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Travis Bouldin seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order
denying several motions in his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)
matter.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral

orders,

28

U.S.C.

§ 1292

(2012);

Fed.

R.

Civ.

P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949).

The order Bouldin seeks to appeal is neither a final

order

an

nor

Accordingly,

we

appealable
deny

interlocutory

leave

to

proceed

or
in

collateral
forma

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

order.

pauperis

and

We dispense with
contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2