US v. Mike Brockett

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:92-cr-00088-4 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999807913]. Mailed to: Mike Andrew Brockett. [15-7474]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7474 Doc: 13 Filed: 04/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7474 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MIKE ANDREW BROCKETT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:92-cr-00088-4) Submitted: March 31, 2016 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. THACKER, Decided: Circuit Judges, and April 29, 2016 DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mike Andrew Brockett, Appellant Pro Se. Alyssa Kate Nichol, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7474 Doc: 13 Filed: 04/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Mike Andrew Brockett appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of his sentence. We reversible error. have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brockett, No. 2:92-cr-00088-4 (E.D. Va. July 24, 2015). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?