US v. Mike Brockett
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:92-cr-00088-4 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999807913]. Mailed to: Mike Andrew Brockett. [15-7474]
Appeal: 15-7474
Doc: 13
Filed: 04/29/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7474
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MIKE ANDREW BROCKETT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:92-cr-00088-4)
Submitted:
March 31, 2016
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
THACKER,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
April 29, 2016
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mike Andrew Brockett, Appellant Pro Se. Alyssa Kate Nichol,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-7474
Doc: 13
Filed: 04/29/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Mike
Andrew
Brockett
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction
of
his
sentence.
We
reversible error.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
United States v. Brockett, No. 2:92-cr-00088-4 (E.D. Va.
July 24, 2015).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?