Stanley Corbett, Jr. v. G. J. Branker
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-ct-03201-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999731477]. Mailed to: Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr. [15-7486]
Appeal: 15-7486
Doc: 13
Filed: 01/07/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7486
STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
CHARDAN WHITEHEAD; TIJUAN WILSON; SAMUEL MCCRAE; BILLY JOE
RIDDLE; JOHN DAVIS; HASEEM EVERETT; JEROME PETERS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
G. J. BRANKER; SERGEANT PRADO; OFFICER LANCASTER; OFFICER
HOLLOMAN; OFFICER HICKS; OFFICER JAMES; KENNETH LASSITER;
MICHAEL NORRIS; BRENT SOUCIER; ARTHUR MARSH; OFFICER OATES;
OFFICER BIDWELL; MARCEL COLLEYMORE; OFFICER TYSON; OFFICER
ALEXANDER,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
SERGEANT REED; OFFICER MOORE; OFFICER PRESS;
SUMMERLIN; OFFICER LASSITER; JARED WELCH; BEN
OFFICER HUNT,
OFFICER
MORGAN;
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:13-ct-03201-BO)
Submitted:
January 5, 2016
Decided:
January 7, 2016
Appeal: 15-7486
Doc: 13
Filed: 01/07/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Judith Maria
Estevez, Assistant Attorney General, Donna Elizabeth Tanner,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-7486
Doc: 13
Filed: 01/07/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr., seeks to appeal the district
court’s
order
granting
the
Defendants’
motion
for
summary
judgment as to Corbett’s claims in a civil rights action brought
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012).
This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012),
and
certain
interlocutory
and
collateral
orders,
28
U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
The order Corbett
seeks
nor
to
appeal
is
neither
a
final
interlocutory or collateral order.
appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
order
an
appealable
Accordingly, we dismiss the
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?