Keith Barkley v. State of Maryland

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00399-GLR. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999774370]. Mailed to: K. Barkley. [15-7495]

Appeal: 15-7495

Doc: 14

Filed: 03/15/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7495

KEITH BARKLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND; CSM O’LEARY,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-00399-GLR)

Submitted:

February 29, 2016

Decided:

March 15, 2016

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Barkley, Appellant Pro Se.
Michael O’Connor Doyle,
Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7495

Doc: 14

Filed: 03/15/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Keith Barkley appeals the district court’s order granting
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the

Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court.

Barkley v. Maryland,

No. 1:14-cv-00399-GLR (D. Md. Sept. 2, 2015).

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2