Patrick Parker v. Dr. Peter Ober

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999708482-2]. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-00490-MSD-DEM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999824924]. Mailed to: Patrick Parker. [15-7509]

Appeal: 15-7509

Doc: 24

Filed: 05/17/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7509

PATRICK PARKER, a/k/a Mustafa Muhjahid,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. PETER OBER, Physician;
LEVIN; MICHELLE ROSSMAN, MD,

DR.

KING,

Physician;

LEONARD

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:13-cv-00490-MSD-DEM)

Submitted:

March 25, 2016

Decided:

May 17, 2016

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick Parker, Appellant Pro Se.
Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER &
COWARD,
PC,
Virginia
Beach,
Virginia;
Elizabeth
Martin
Muldowney, RAWLS, MCNELIS & MITCHELL, PC, Richmond, Virginia;
John E. Peterson, Jr., HANCOCK DANIEL JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Glen
Allen, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7509

Doc: 24

Filed: 05/17/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Patrick Parker appeals the district court’s order granting
Defendants’

motions

for

summary

judgment

or

to

dismiss

for

failure to state a claim Parker’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action
alleging deliberate indifference to his medical needs.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
substantially

for

the

reasons

stated

by

the

district

court.

Parker v. Ober, No. 2:13-cv-00490-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va. filed Aug.
25,

2015

&

entered

Aug.

26,

2015).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2