David Crawley v. George Hinkle

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:14-cv-00300-MFU-JCH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999778177]. Mailed to: David Edward Crawley. [15-7511]

Appeal: 15-7511

Doc: 15

Filed: 03/21/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7511

DAVID CRAWLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GEORGE M. HINKLE; GREGORY HOLLOWAY; W. R. HENSLEY; M. B.
STURGILL; S. T. ISBELL,
Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District
Judge. (7:14-cv-00300-MFU-JCH)

Submitted:

March 17, 2016

Decided:

March 21, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Edward Crawley, Appellant Pro Se.
John Michael Parsons,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7511

Doc: 15

Filed: 03/21/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
David

Edward

Crawley

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief

on

his

42

U.S.C.

§ 1983

(2012)

complaint.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we

affirm

for

the

reasons

stated

by

the

We

have

Accordingly,

district

court.

Crawley v. Hinkle, No. 7:14-cv-00300-MFU-JCH (W.D. Va. Aug. 25,
2015).
we

We deny Crawley’s motion for appointment of counsel and

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2