US v. Hassaan Rashaad

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:01-cr-00195-MOC-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999765028]. Mailed to: Hassaan Rashaad. [15-7515]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7515 Doc: 5 Filed: 03/01/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7515 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HASSAAN HAAKIM RASHAAD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:01-cr-00195-MOC-1) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Circuit Decided: Judges, and March 1, 2016 DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hassaan Haakim Rashaad, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7515 Doc: 5 Filed: 03/01/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Hassaan Haakim Rashaad appeals the district court’s order denying Rashaad’s motion for clarification of the schedule of restitution payments set forth in his 2002 criminal judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. error. See United States v. Rashaad, No. 3:01-cr-00195-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 2015). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?