Bilal Al-Haqq v. Oliver Washington
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-02867-TMC. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Bilal A. Al-Haqq. [15-7522]
Pg: 1 of 4
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
BILAL A. AL-HAQQ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
SGT OLIVER WASHINGTON,
Defendant - Appellee,
JOHN PATE, Warden; MAJOR WALTER WORRICK; AW RANDALL
WILLIAMS; LT RICHARD JENKINS; LT TYLER; CPL MARVIN BRYANT;
MS. EDITH WETHERBEE; MRS. VIRGINIA GRUBBS; MS. V. JONES,
official and individual capacity,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
January 19, 2017
February 3, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and DAVIS,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pg: 2 of 4
Bilal A. Al-Haqq, Appellant Pro Se.
Mary Bass Lohr,
Andrew Yoho, HOWELL, GIBSON & HUGHES, PA, Beaufort,
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 4
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant
magistrate judge recommended that claims against some defendants
magistrate judge advised Al-Haqq in both recommendations that
recommendations could waive appellate review of a district court
order based upon the recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have
been warned of the consequences of noncompliance.
Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also United
States v. Benton, 523 F.3d 424, 428 (4th Cir. 2008).
has waived appellate review by failing to file objections to the
magistrate judge’s first report and recommendation and failing
to file specific objections to the magistrate judge’s second
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
Pg: 4 of 4
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?