Steven Prentice v. Justin Andrew

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999701589-2]; terminating Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999693897-2], terminating Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999680731-2] Originating case number: 5:14-hc-02062-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999762951]. Mailed to: S. Prentice. [15-7542]

Appeal: 15-7542

Doc: 17

Filed: 02/26/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7542

STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JUSTIN ANDREWS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:14-hc-02062-BO)

Submitted:

February 23, 2016

Decided:

February 26, 2016

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Dixon Prentice, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Ann Kelley,
BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7542

Doc: 17

Filed: 02/26/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Steven

Dixon

Prentice,

a

federal

prisoner,

appeals

the

district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2012) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *

Prentice

v. Andrews, No. 5:14-hc-02062-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 2015; Sept.
30, 2015).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

*

To the extent Prentice challenges the amount collected by
the Bureau of Prisons, he failed to show exhaustion of his
administrative remedies.

2