Steven Prentice v. Justin Andrew


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999701589-2]; terminating Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999693897-2], terminating Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999680731-2] Originating case number: 5:14-hc-02062-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999762951]. Mailed to: S. Prentice. [15-7542]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-7542 Doc: 17 Filed: 02/26/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7542 STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JUSTIN ANDREWS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:14-hc-02062-BO) Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 26, 2016 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Dixon Prentice, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Ann Kelley, BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-7542 Doc: 17 Filed: 02/26/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Steven Dixon Prentice, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * Prentice v. Andrews, No. 5:14-hc-02062-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 2015; Sept. 30, 2015). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED * To the extent Prentice challenges the amount collected by the Bureau of Prisons, he failed to show exhaustion of his administrative remedies. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?